top of page
Blog SG.jpg

Benton Blount on Greenville's Growth and Penny Sales Tax Vote

13 minutes ago
7 min read

Greenville County has a problem that comes with being a place people actually want to live: growth isn't slowing down, and the infrastructure is struggling to keep up.


Traffic congestion, aging roads, housing affordability, disappearing farmland, and rising development pressure have become familiar concerns across the Upstate. Everyone seems to agree that something needs to change. The disagreement starts when the conversation turns to who should pay for it.


That's where Greenville County Council Chairman Benton Blount comes in.


The former America's Got Talent finalist and country music artist has spent the past several years navigating the complicated world of local government. Now, with Greenville County voters preparing to decide on a proposed penny sales tax, Blount is discussing what the county needs, what it can realistically afford, and why the answer isn't as simple as cutting a few expenses.


The conversation goes well beyond roads. It raises a much bigger question about Greenville's future: How does a growing county protect what makes it desirable without making life more expensive for the people already living there?


Benton Blount on Greenville's Growth and Penny Sales Tax Vote


Greenville's Growth and Penny Sales Tax Vote: What's Really at Stake?


The debate surrounding Greenville's Growth and Penny Sales Tax Vote comes down to a difficult balancing act.


Greenville County needs infrastructure improvements. Residents want less traffic, better roads, protected green space, and more responsible development. But they also want government spending under control and taxes kept manageable.


Benton Blount on Greenville's Growth and Penny Sales Tax Vote


Chairman Blount argues that those priorities aren't necessarily incompatible. The challenge is finding enough money to address decades of infrastructure needs while maintaining essential county services.


And the numbers reveal why that is so difficult.



From America's Got Talent to County Council


Blount's journey into local government wasn't exactly conventional.


Before entering politics, he was a country music artist who reached the finals of America's Got Talent, finishing fifth. He moved from Nashville to Greenville after connecting with singer-songwriter Edwin McCain, whose downtown studio initially brought him to the area.


Nearly 20 years later, Greenville had become home.


Before COVID, Blount spent approximately 200 days a year traveling for music. When touring stopped, he had an opportunity to pay closer attention to his community and the people representing it.


That experience eventually led him to county council.


Blount describes his early years in office as a crash course in local government. Zoning, regulations, public safety, budgeting, and the complicated relationships between county departments all required learning on the job.


His biggest takeaway was that elected officials shouldn't promise results they cannot deliver individually. With 12 council members making decisions, meaningful change requires cooperation rather than one person's campaign promises.



Can Greenville Control Growth Without Stopping Development?


Few topics create more disagreement in Greenville than development.


Residents worry about traffic, overcrowding, disappearing farmland, and neighborhoods changing faster than infrastructure can support.


Developers face their own challenges, including regulations, planning requirements, and uncertainty about what projects will be allowed.


Blount believes the solution begins with balance.


State law limits the county's ability to simply stop development. That means local government must work within existing legal requirements while considering community concerns and private property rights.


One challenge is that some community plans and county regulations have fallen out of alignment.


Blount explained that Greenville County is working to reconnect its comprehensive plan with the ordinances that govern development. He also hopes to introduce a trace-and-trackability ordinance that would flag related regulations whenever the comprehensive plan changes.


The goal is to prevent outdated policies from conflicting with newer planning decisions.


For homeowners and prospective buyers, those decisions matter because development policies influence housing costs, neighborhood character, and where future growth occurs.



What Would Greenville County's Penny Sales Tax Actually Fund?


The proposed county sales tax would add one cent per dollar to applicable purchases for eight years.


According to Blount, the money would be divided primarily among three priorities.


Approximately 90% would fund road projects. That includes resurfacing, repairs, and congestion relief. The county's transportation problems aren't limited to potholes. Traffic delays have become a significant concern as growth outpaces infrastructure.


Another 7% would support greenbelt initiatives, including conservation easements intended to help protect farmland and natural areas.


The remaining portion would support transit.


Blount argues that these priorities reflect Greenville County's diversity. Northern communities may place greater emphasis on preserving agricultural land, while more developed areas face stronger transportation and congestion concerns.


Not every district has identical needs, but the proposal attempts to address several of them through one funding mechanism.



Why Can't the County Just Cut Spending?


It's probably the most common objection to the tax proposal.


If Greenville County already has a $483 million budget, why can't officials redirect existing money toward roads?


Blount says the county has already increased road funding significantly.


For nearly two decades, annual road funding was generally between $8 million and $13 million. That amount has since increased to approximately $33 million.


Even so, road construction and maintenance remain expensive. Blount estimates that one mile of road work can cost more than $600,000.


He also says the county has comparatively few employees relative to its population, creating staffing and retention challenges.


The argument isn't that government spending should escape scrutiny. Blount discussed ongoing reviews of public safety funding and county budgeting practices.


Rather, his position is that eliminating programs such as transit and land preservation would free only a few million dollars while potentially creating other costs.


Critics may disagree about which services deserve funding, but the central question remains: How much of Greenville's infrastructure backlog can realistically be addressed through spending cuts alone?



Greenville's Road Backlog Is Enormous


One of the most striking figures from the discussion is the estimated $3 billion infrastructure backlog, including state and federal highways.


Blount estimates that addressing the backlog through property taxes alone could require a 78-mill increase and take until 2117.


For comparison, a previous property tax increase was seven mills.


That comparison helps explain why county leaders are considering a different revenue source.


Blount also acknowledged that the county previously raised property taxes too abruptly. He argued that gradually spreading increases across several budget cycles would have been preferable.


The proposed penny sales tax represents another approach, one that supporters believe could generate more substantial infrastructure funding without relying entirely on property owners.


Whether that tradeoff is worthwhile is ultimately the decision voters face.



Why Visitors Matter in the Sales Tax Debate


One argument for the penny sales tax is that Greenville County residents wouldn't be the only people contributing.


Visitors, commuters, and people shopping in Greenville while living elsewhere would also pay the tax on applicable purchases.


Blount estimated that approximately 25% of the revenue could come from outside the county, although he acknowledged hearing higher estimates.


He also emphasized exemptions for categories such as groceries, gasoline, prescription medications, and electric bills.


In his view, a consumption-based tax offers certain advantages over property taxes because people from outside the county help fund infrastructure they use.


That doesn't make the proposal cost-free for residents.


Local households would still pay additional taxes on applicable purchases, and some voters may prefer a different funding strategy.


The central choice is whether the benefits of a dedicated infrastructure tax outweigh the additional cost.



Why the Road Project List Would Change Every Year


Another controversial element of Greenville's Growth and Penny Sales Tax Vote involves how road projects would be selected.


The previous proposal included a fixed list of projects. This version would allow projects to be approved annually.


Some residents have criticized that approach because they want to know exactly what their tax dollars would fund before voting.


Blount argues that a fixed eight-year project list creates its own problems.


Construction costs change. Projects become more expensive. A road improvement estimated at one price today could cost substantially more several years later.


He pointed to the Woodruff Road bypass as an example of how dramatically project costs can increase.


Under the proposed approach, the county would approve projects each year rather than commit to an inflexible eight-year schedule.


Blount believes that provides greater flexibility and opportunities for public input.


Critics, however, may prefer the certainty of a predetermined list. The disagreement reflects two different views of accountability: knowing the projects in advance versus reviewing spending decisions every year.


Who Would Watch the Money?


Transparency remains a major concern, especially when voters are being asked to approve additional taxes.


Blount described plans for a public oversight committee with access to information about sales-tax-funded projects, contracts, departmental spending, and changes in project costs.


He said he would welcome critics of the proposal serving on that committee.


His goal is to make financial information available throughout the process rather than requiring residents to wait until projects are completed.


The committee would help communicate that information to neighborhoods and provide another layer of public accountability.


For voters concerned about how the money would be managed, the effectiveness of that oversight structure is an important part of evaluating the proposal.



County Taxes Versus City Taxes


Greenville County isn't the only local government discussing a penny sales tax.


Municipalities have their own proposals, raising questions for voters who may face more than one tax decision.


Blount argues that the county proposal would serve a broader geographic area, while city proposals would focus on improvements within individual municipalities.


He also acknowledges that cooperation matters.


Roads, intersections, traffic signals, and transportation systems often involve multiple jurisdictions. City, county, and state responsibilities overlap, making collaboration necessary.


Rather than treating the proposals as competing projects, Blount encourages residents to understand what each one would fund.



Greenville's Future Depends on More Than Roads


Infrastructure is only one part of Greenville's growth conversation.


Blount also highlighted public safety, housing affordability, responsible development, and community involvement.


One encouraging development, he said, is the growing number of residents interested in serving on boards and commissions.


Community planning groups in places such as Berea, City View, and Monaghan provide opportunities for residents to influence local development discussions.


Blount believes greater public participation can help the county make better decisions, especially when those decisions involve competing priorities.


For Greenville's future, that may be just as important as the outcome of any single tax vote.



How to Contact Benton Blount


Benton Blount | Chairman, Greenville County Council


A former America's Got Talent finalist and country music artist turned local government leader, Benton Blount encourages residents to reach out about county issues, community involvement, and local government decisions.



Residents can also participate through county council meetings, local community groups, and Greenville County boards and commissions.



Watch Or Listen To The Selling Greenville Podcast


Subscribe to the Selling Greenville podcast for real-time insights, bold perspectives, and unfiltered takes on the Upstate housing scene. Whether you're buying, selling, or simply watching the market unfold, this is where Greenville goes to stay informed.





Bottom Line


Greenville's Growth and Penny Sales Tax Vote represents a bigger conversation about what kind of county residents want Greenville to become.


The infrastructure needs are substantial, and the funding choices are complicated. Supporters see the proposed tax as a way to accelerate road improvements, preserve land, and support transit. Critics have legitimate questions about additional taxes, project selection, and accountability.


For Greenville residents, the most important thing is understanding what's being proposed, what it would cost, and how the money would be managed.


Growth isn't stopping. The question is how Greenville plans to handle it.



Ien Araneta

Journal & Podcast Editor | Selling Greenville

Comments


bottom of page