iBuyers Found “Naked in the Water” While Mom and Pop House Flippers Thrived

Some stories don’t need spin—they just need daylight. In this episode, the host lays out how iBuyers charged into a shifting market with algorithmic confidence and then got caught when the tide rolled out. Meanwhile, local investors—the so-called “mom and pop” flippers—kept their footing, relying on on-the-ground knowledge, sensible pricing, and renovations that actually fit what buyers want. It’s a tale of two strategies: distant models versus local judgment.

Inside the iBuyers Market Failure

A wave of deals revealed how iBuyers overpaid at the peak, misread the slowdown, and then bled through price cuts—while local flippers adapted in real time and kept winning.

When algorithms met reality

The episode revisits a warning the host flagged months ago: iBuyers don’t truly run on local expertise. They buy and price with computer models—great at scale, shaky on nuance. In an up-only environment, that didn’t matter; rising prices could rescue an overpay in a few months. But once appreciation cooled, the safety net vanished, and the “model” had to meet the market.

That meeting wasn’t kind.

“Naked in the water”

There’s a line about discovering who’s “naked in the water” when the tide goes out. That’s what happened as the market shifted. The episode spotlights a Bloomberg piece outlining how iBuyers—notably in Phoenix—were suddenly exposed: properties purchased at top-of-market numbers, shallow updates, poor fit for actual buyer expectations, and then hefty, repeated price drops just to move inventory.

Overpaying in daylight

One example hits like a case study. A local flipper—Yousef—renovated a two-bedroom townhome and then sold it to Opendoor for $265,000, a price that, according to the episode summary of the article, was $30,000 above the next highest bidder. Opendoor later relisted it for $218,000—a $47,000 haircut before fees or any additional work. And even at that ask, the local investor believed the number was still too high for where the market had moved. He was reportedly watching to buy it back once the price dropped far enough—a full circle few flippers ever get to draw.

Another Phoenix example was even starker: Opendoor paid $646,000 in June, then sold months later for $485,000—roughly a 25% loss in about five months. That isn’t “margin compression.” That’s the oxygen leaving the room.

The numbers behind the pain

The episode quotes data from Phoenix that paint the broader picture:

• Opendoor lost money on 89% of the homes it sold in Q4, averaging $58,000 per sale before fees and expenses.

• On average, it flipped homes for 12% less than the original purchase price in that quarter.

• The company wrote down its portfolio by $573 million, and the stock had fallen 94% from its 2021 high at the time referenced.

Inside the episode’s telling, the company said it anticipated a shift but not the speed and scale of it—and chose to honor pending contracts rather than cancel. Whatever the rationale, the outcomes on the resale side are sitting in plain sight.

Why local flippers kept winning

While iBuyers were misfiring, local flippers, per the episode’s recap, were averaging resales around 20% above purchase price. The episode doesn’t credit a magic formula; it credits local sense.

Local operators buy the right kind of distress, put more care into renovations, and—crucially—understand what matters in a specific neighborhood. A model might see “lot size” and “fence.” A local pro sees that the “yard” is a steep slope no one can use. In one Greenville example from the episode, an iBuyer paid high at the peak for a home in a hot area—but the backyard was so sloped it was effectively unusable. Algorithms can’t grade a hill; buyers can, and they did, forcing the list price down toward the original purchase number just to re-find the market.

Timing, fit, and price (in that order)

The episode’s throughline is simple: even in a cooling phase, well-bought, well-finished properties that fit local expectations still move; poorly chosen, poorly fitted ones don’t. iBuyers are often priced at or above the very top of the neighborhood, then wait for the market to “catch up.” That worked during the surge. In the slowdown, it turned into a long, costly wait—then a cut, and then another.

Local flippers, on the other hand, read the room. They know when a backyard kills a price, when a layout needs a wall moved (not just paint), and when “top of market” is a mirage. They’re not guessing; they’re walking the comps, talking with other pros, and noticing the details no spreadsheet cell has ever met.

A shift in strategy: finding opportunities in the wreckage

The episode also notes a tactical change. Historically, the host avoided iBuyer listings because of inconsistent workmanship and clunky logistics. But with the new price-cut reality—especially on homes that have been sitting—a different play has emerged: target the iBuyers’ stale, repeatedly reduced listings as potential value buys. In other words, where the corporate model got over its skis, someone local may now find a fair deal—if the property itself (condition, layout, lot) actually fits what people want.

The lesson behind the headlines

Strip away the numbers, and you’re left with a human-scale lesson: homes are local. They live on slopes and cul-de-sacs, near loud roads and quiet trees, under HOAs that matter and skylines that don’t. Buyers feel all of that in a showing. iBuyers try to abstract it. In a bull run, abstraction floats. In a mixed market, it sinks.

And no, this doesn’t mean every iBuyer deal fails or every local flip wins. It means the tools that ignore local texture are brittle when conditions change. The episode’s evidence—spanning overpays, deep cuts, and portfolio write-downs—shows what brittle looks like at scale.

Watch Or Listen To The Selling Greenville Podcast

Subscribe to the Selling Greenville podcast for real-time insights, bold perspectives, and unfiltered takes on the Upstate housing scene. Whether you’re buying, selling, or simply watching the market unfold—this is where Greenville goes to stay informed.

Bottom Line

The market didn’t collapse; it clarified. iBuyers who leaned on algorithms and peak-era habits were “naked in the water” once appreciation slowed. Local flippers, grounded in neighborhood detail and practical renovations, kept shipping wins. The winners weren’t louder; they were closer—closer to the streets, the lots, and the lived-in truths that decide price and pace.

Ien Araneta

Journal & Podcast Editor | Selling Greenville