The “Prices Must Drop” Myth (and Why It Won’t)

Some ideas spread because they feel good—not because they hold up. The Prices Must Drop Myth is one of them. It sounds cathartic in an era when first-time buyers skew older than ever, anger simmers online, and crash predictions rake in clicks. But when that emotion collides with how housing actually works—especially in Greenville—the narrative breaks apart. This episode sets the record straight, tracing why prices haven’t cratered despite rising inventory, why 2008 isn’t repeating on command, and what really needs to change if affordability is the goal.

Prices Must Drop Myth: What People Say vs. What the Market Shows

Prices Must Drop Myth: “We don’t need more homes, and we don’t need lower rates—we just need prices to go down.” It’s tidy, viral, and wrong. The Prices Must Drop Myth ignores the engine that drives housing outcomes: supply and demand, plus the reality that today’s sellers aren’t forced into panic pricing. When those pieces are understood together, the “prices will fall because we want them to” argument has nowhere to stand.

The anger is real—but anger isn’t a market force

There’s a genuine frustration in the buyer pool. First-time buyers are older than past norms, and many feel locked out. That frustration often morphs into doomerism and crash timelines that keep getting pushed back. The talking points change, but the feelings remain. Feelings, however, don’t list homes, approve loans, or set comps. Markets do.

The supply story people hoped for… and the one they got

For years, doomers said rising inventory would force a price collapse. Inventory did rise in many places—and in Greenville, late-year data even showed a sharp December pullback worth tracking closely. What didn’t happen? A broad price crash. Instead, appreciation cooled, sometimes flattened, and in a few pockets nationally dipped—while most of the U.S., and Greenville specifically, kept prices generally moving up or holding steady. Why? Because today’s sellers aren’t the same as 2008’s sellers.

Equity changes everything

In 2008, many owners had little or no equity and were pushed into foreclosures or distressed sales. That dynamic flooded the market with must-sell inventory and crushed pricing power. Today, owners carry significant equity cushions. If a home “worth” $500,000 last year comps closer to $450,000 now, most owners can wait—refinance, restructure, or simply stay put—rather than fire-sale. Fewer forced sellers means fewer distressed comps. Without distress, the lever that rips prices lower isn’t being pulled.

Foreclosures aren’t fueling a collapse

Greenville’s reads here are clear: the share of foreclosures among sales in the past year has been less than 1%—about half a percent. That isn’t a tidal wave; it’s a ripple. And with ripples, you don’t get 2008-style price cascades. The myth depends on a foreclosure surge that isn’t happening.

The moving goalposts—and the newest talking point

When inventory spikes didn’t produce a crash, the narrative morphed into the Prices Must Drop Myth. It says: forget supply, forget rates—just make prices lower. But price is an outcome, not a policy. Without a forced-seller pipeline or a sustained, overwhelming supply shock, the gravity isn’t there to drag prices down broadly—especially in a market where equity is strong, and owners can opt out of bad offers.

Why Greenville’s dynamics blunt the myth

• Supply & demand still rule. More supply cools appreciation; it doesn’t guarantee collapse—especially when sellers aren’t compelled to capitulate.

• Affordability improves at the margin when rates ease. Late-year movement from ~8% toward ~6% opened doors for buyers and supported stability.

• Distress is scarce. With foreclosures comprising a sliver of sales, the “bargain wave” some are waiting for doesn’t arrive.

What the myth risks in the real world

There’s a policy danger inside the slogan. If people convince themselves “building more homes doesn’t help,” the next step is opposing new construction on principle. That’s just NIMBYism with a new coat of paint—and it pushes affordability the wrong way. Fewer homes mean tighter supply, which props up prices and undercuts the very households the myth claims to defend.

“But sellers overprice!” (They do—and here’s why it still doesn’t crack)

Yes, most sellers initially overvalue their homes. That’s human nature. But unless they’re forced, they won’t accept steep losses. Without the comp pressure of widespread distressed sales, wishful overpricing usually meets the same outcome: time on market, price adjustments, or a decision to stay put—not a systemic price break that rescues every frustrated shopper.

The 2008 comparison falls apart

Some crash callers keep pointing at 2008. But the core ingredients are different:

• Then: thin equity, lax underwriting, and waves of forced sales.

• Now: thick equity, stricter lending, and the ability to restructure or wait. Without the “must-sell” accelerant, you don’t get the same fire.

What getting unstuck could look like (without the myth)

The episode makes a practical point: waiting for an apocalypse is not a plan. Real strategies sound like this: redefining a starter home, exploring loan structures (including adjustable options) based on real-time horizons, considering markets where the payment works, or simply moving when the math—rates, income, and price—lines up. None of that requires pretending prices will fall on command. It requires working with the market that exists.

A Greenville lens on affordability momentum

Affordability has shown moments of improvement as rates stepped down from the eighths to the sixes and as appreciation cooled from the breakneck pace of prior years. No one’s claiming a miracle cure, and no one’s promising smooth sailing. But the idea that the solution is simply “make prices drop” ignores how those improvements actually happen at the edges—through rate stability, measured supply gains, and fewer spikes in volatility.

The content economy vs. real analysis

There’s a reason crash videos perform: they sell catharsis. But clicks don’t close. Data does. This show’s posture is simple—let the numbers drive the take, not the other way around. The Prices Must Drop Myth will keep trending because it meets a mood. The market won’t follow it, because it doesn’t match the mechanics.

Watch Or Listen To The Selling Greenville Podcast

Subscribe to the Selling Greenville podcast for real-time insights, bold perspectives, and unfiltered takes on the Upstate housing scene. Whether you’re buying, selling, or simply watching the market unfold—this is where Greenville goes to stay informed.

Bottom Line

The Prices Must Drop Myth promises relief without cause. In Greenville, the ingredients that force widespread price declines—mass distress and must-sell pipelines—aren’t present. Equity cushions let owners wait. Foreclosures remain a rounding error. Supply and demand still decide outcomes, and recent rate relief has nudged affordability in the right direction. Those hoping for a repeat of 2008 are watching a different movie. Real progress won’t come from chanting a slogan; it comes from building where possible, watching rates, and making moves when the math supports them.

Ien Araneta

Journal & Podcast Editor | Selling Greenville